CALL TODAY FOR FREE CASE REVIEW
Medical malpractice in nursing homes occurs when licensed medical professionals—such as physicians, nurses, nurse practitioners, wound-care teams, or facility medical directors—fail to meet the accepted standard of medical care, resulting in injury or death.
While nursing homes must provide custodial and supportive care, they are also responsible for delivering proper clinical care, including medication management, wound treatment, infection monitoring, fall prevention, hydration/nutrition oversight, and timely emergency transfers.
Medical malpractice in long-term care often involves:
Failure to diagnose infections (UTIs, sepsis, pneumonia)
Delay in transferring to a hospital or calling 911
Improper medication prescribing, dosing, or monitoring
Neglecting wound care orders and pressure ulcer protocols
Failure to intervene when a resident declines
Ignoring vitals, labs, or abnormal findings
Improper physical assessments or missed symptoms
When these clinical errors cause harm, families may pursue both medical malpractice and elder abuse claims, depending on whether the conduct was negligent or reckless.
California courts recognize that nursing-home malpractice can rise above simple negligence when it reflects recklessness, conscious disregard, or systemic clinical failures.
Delaney v. Baker (1999) — The California Supreme Court held that failing to provide necessary medical care to a dependent elder, especially when wounds, infections, or deterioration are ignored, may constitute reckless neglect under EADACPA, allowing enhanced damages.
Mack v. Soung (2000) — The court held that a physician’s failure to examine, respond to deterioration, or transfer the resident to the hospital could support a finding of elder abuse when done with conscious disregard for the patient’s safety. This case is central to malpractice-in-nursing-home claims.
Sababin v. Superior Court (2006) — The court emphasized that when staff ignore care-plan requirements, skip assessments, or fail to document medical care, this conduct can rise above negligence and support EADACPA liability.
Covenant Care v. Superior Court (2004) — The Supreme Court confirmed that systemic clinical neglect (missed medications, unchecked symptoms, falsified records, inadequate staffing) may justify punitive damages when the conduct violates resident safety rights.
Together, these cases show that California law does not excuse clinical failures in nursing homes. When physicians or nurses ignore lab results, fail to monitor symptoms, disregard wound care, or delay emergency transfers, families may pursue both malpractice damages and enhanced elder-abuse remedies.